I knowingly added this question because it's equivocal. I saw the question somewhere and solved it only for the publisher to tell I was wrong. Solved it another way and got a different answer (correct according to the publisher). I included the two answers in the options!
First Answer Difference between 15 and 7 = 8 Difference between 31 and 15 = 16 So, the series is n + (8 x y). Where y > 1 and n = previous number and y = position of previous number
I knowingly added this question because it's equivocal. I saw the question somewhere and solved it only for the publisher to tell I was wrong. Solved it another way and got a different answer (correct according to the publisher). I included the two answers in the options!
First Answer Difference between 15 and 7 = 8 Difference between 31 and 15 = 16 So, the series is n + (8 x y). Where y > 1 and n = previous number and y = position of previous number
So, answer = 31 + (8 x 3) = 31 + 24 = 55
Second Answer 15 = (7 x 2) + 1 31 = (15 x 2) + 1
So, answer = (31 x 2) + 1 = 63
Answer: both 55 and 63 are correct
BY Riddles Repository - Answers
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/tg-me/post.php on line 283
Durov said on his Telegram channel today that the two and a half year blockchain and crypto project has been put to sleep. Ironically, after leaving Russia because the government wanted his encryption keys to his social media firm, Durov’s cryptocurrency idea lost steam because of a U.S. court. “The technology we created allowed for an open, free, decentralized exchange of value and ideas. TON had the potential to revolutionize how people store and transfer funds and information,” he wrote on his channel. “Unfortunately, a U.S. court stopped TON from happening.”
That growth environment will include rising inflation and interest rates. Those upward shifts naturally accompany healthy growth periods as the demand for resources, products and services rise. Importantly, the Federal Reserve has laid out the rationale for not interfering with that natural growth transition.It's not exactly a fad, but there is a widespread willingness to pay up for a growth story. Classic fundamental analysis takes a back seat. Even negative earnings are ignored. In fact, positive earnings seem to be a limiting measure, producing the question, "Is that all you've got?" The preference is a vision of untold riches when the exciting story plays out as expected.
